Vector Group Ltd.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 12b-25
SEC File Number 1-5759
NOTIFICATION OF LATE FILING
(Check One): o Form 10-K o Form 20-F o Form 11-K x Form 10-Q
o Form 10-D o Form N-SAR o Form N-CSR
For Period Ended: September 30, 2006
|
|
|
o Transition Report on Form 10-K
|
|
o Transition Report on Form 10-Q |
o Transition Report on Form 20-F
|
|
o Transition Report on Form N-SAR |
o Transition Report on Form 11-K |
|
|
For the
Transition Period
Ended:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Read instruction (on back page) before preparing form. Please print or type.
Nothing in this form shall be construed to imply that the Commission has verified any
information contained herein.
If the notification relates to a portion of the filing checked above, identify item(s) to
which the notification relates: _________
Part I. Registrant Information
Full name of registrant Vector Group Ltd.
Former name if applicable
Address of principal executive office (Street and number)
100 S.E. Second Street
City, State and Zip Code Miami, Florida 33131
Part II. Rule 12b-25(b) and (c)
If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or expense and the
registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the following should be completed. (Check box
if appropriate.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The reasons described in reasonable detail in Part III of this form could not
be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense; |
|
x
|
|
(b)
|
|
The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F,
Form 11-K, Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before 15th
calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the subject quarterly report or transition
report on Form 10-Q, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifth calendar day
following the prescribed due date; and |
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
The accountants statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has been
attached if applicable. |
Part III. Narrative
State below in reasonable detail the reasons why Form 10-K, 20-F, 11-K, 10-Q, 10-D,
N-SAR, N-CSR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could not be filed within the prescribed
time period. (Attach extra sheets if needed).
As announced on November 9, 2006, the Company has determined that it will restate its
financial results for 2004, 2005 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006. The
restatement will correct an error in the computation of the debt discount amortization created by
the embedded derivative and the beneficial conversion feature associated with the Companys 5%
variable interest senior convertible notes due 2011. The effect of the restatement will be to
decrease previously reported non-cash interest expense and to increase previously reported income
by a total of approximately $8.1 million on a pre-tax basis for the affected periods. The
restatement will have no effect on previously reported operating income or net reported cash flows
for the restated periods. As a result of the restatement, this previously reported non-cash
interest expense of approximately $8.1 million will be recognized over the remaining term of the
convertible debt. As a result of the significant resources necessary to effect the restatement,
the Company was not able to file its Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
within the period prescribed for the filing of such report.
2
Part IV. Other Information
(1) Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this notification.
|
|
|
|
|
Bryant
Kirkland
|
|
305
|
|
579-8000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Name)
|
|
(Area Code)
|
|
(Telephone Number) |
(2) Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12
months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s) been
filed? If the answer is no, identify report(s).
x Yes o No
(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the
corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be
included in the subject report or portion thereof?
x Yes o No
If so, attach an explanation of the anticipated change, both narratively and quantitatively,
and, if appropriate, state the reasons why a reasonable estimate of the results cannot be made.
The Companys unaudited revenues and operating income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 in the Form 10-Q will be consistent with the operating data in the attached
Exhibit 99.1. The results for the three months ended September 30, 2006, when fully reported, will
include an $11.5 million decrease in reported income tax expense due to the reduction of the
Companys previously established reserves as a result of its July 2006 settlement with the Internal
Revenue Service. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when fully reported,
will include a non-cash charge of $14.9 million associated with the issuance in June 2006 of
additional shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of $70.0 million of the
Companys 6.25% convertible notes due 2008 and the $11.5 million decrease in reported income tax
expense as a result of the previously referenced July 2006 settlement with the Internal Revenue
Service.
On November 9, 2006, the Company determined that it would restate its financial statements for
each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, and selected financial data for each of the
years 2004 and 2005 appearing in Item 6 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year
ended December 31, 2005, as well as its interim financial statements for the quarters ended March
31, 2005 and 2006, June 30, 2005 and 2006, and September 30, 2005. The restatement will correct an
error in the computation of the amortization of the debt discount created by the embedded
derivative and the beneficial conversion feature associated with the Companys 5% variable interest
senior convertible notes due 2011. As a result, the Companys previously issued financial
statements for these periods should not be relied upon.
The revised financial statements and selected financial data for the periods referenced above
will be included, as applicable, in an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year
ended December 31, 2005, and in amended Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March
31, 2006 and June 30, 2006. The revised interim financial statements for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 will be included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. The Company expects to file the amended documents as promptly as practicable.
The
Company previously amortized the debt discount using an erroneous amortization method
that did not result in a consistent yield on
the convertible debt over its term (the effective interest method). The amortization method used
by the Company resulted in an overstatement of non-cash interest expense during 2004 and 2005, all
interim
3
periods in 2005 and the first two interim periods in 2006 than that which would have resulted
using the effective interest method. The effect of the restatement will be to decrease previously
reported non-cash interest expense and to increase previously reported income by a total of
approximately $8.1 million on a pre-tax basis for the affected periods as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
Net Income (loss) |
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
As reported |
|
As restated |
|
As reported |
|
As restated |
Three months ended December 31,
2004 |
|
$ |
5,332 |
|
|
$ |
4,811 |
|
|
$ |
11,024 |
|
|
$ |
11,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
25,077 |
|
|
|
24,556 |
|
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
7,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
6,647 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
11,496 |
|
|
|
12,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
9,242 |
|
|
|
7,581 |
|
|
|
10,277 |
|
|
|
11,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
2005 |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended December 31,
2005 |
|
|
7,825 |
|
|
|
6,626 |
|
|
|
18,087 |
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
31,980 |
|
|
|
26,731 |
|
|
|
49,095 |
|
|
|
52,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
7,052 |
|
|
|
9,293 |
|
|
|
10,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
8,802 |
|
|
|
7,724 |
|
|
|
(3,349 |
) |
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
The restatement will have no effect on previously reported operating income or net reported
cash flows for the restated periods. As a result of the restatement, this previously reported
non-cash interest expense of approximately $8.1 million will be recognized over the remaining term
of the convertible debt.
In the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each of the quarterly periods ended March
31, 2005 and 2006, June 30, 2005 and 2006, and September 30, 2005, and in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, management originally reported that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of each of those dates. Further, in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, management concluded
that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005. In the
light of the restatement discussed above, the Company has reassessed the effectiveness of its
disclosure controls and procedures, and its internal control over financial reporting as of those
dates, respectively, and has concluded that they were not effective as of those dates due to the
material weakness discussed below.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
The Company did not maintain effective controls over the accuracy of its debt discount
amortization. Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective controls to ensure that the
amortization of its debt discount created by the embedded derivative
and beneficial conversion feature resulted in a consistent yield on the Companys 5% variable
interest senior convertible notes due 2011 over its term in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles through application of the effective interest method. This control
deficiency resulted in the restatement of the Companys annual consolidated financial statements
for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, all interim periods in 2005, the first two interim
periods of 2006 and adjustments to the third interim period of 2006. In addition, this control
deficiency could result in misstatement of the Companys debt,
other assets and interest expense that would
result in a material misstatement to the Companys annual or interim
4
consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly the
Companys management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.
In response to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described
above, management has reviewed its procedures and processes over the accuracy of its debt discount
amortization. The Company has revised the amortization of its debt discount for its 5% variable
interest senior convertible notes due 2011 and plans to establish a control to test the
amortization of debt discounts to ascertain that such amortization results in a consistent yield on
the Companys convertible debt over its term in accordance with the effective interest method and
generally accepted accounting principles. The Company will perform such a review and test for any
new convertible debt or any changes to projected interest payments on its existing convertible debt
to ensure it results in a consistent yield. The Company will continue to monitor the effectiveness
of this newly designed control to ascertain when the aforementioned material weakness has been
remediated.
The decision to restate the Companys consolidated financial statements was made by the
Companys Audit Committee on November 9, 2006 upon the recommendation of the Companys management.
The Chairman of the Companys Audit Committee and the Companys Chief Financial Officer have
discussed the matters disclosed in this filing with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Companys
independent registered certified public accounting firm.
5
Vector Group Ltd.
(Name of Registrant as specified in charter)
has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 13, 2006 |
By: |
/s/
J. Bryant Kirkland III
|
|
|
|
Name: |
J. Bryant Kirkland III |
|
|
|
Title: |
Vice President, Treasurer & Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
6
EX-99.1 Operating Data
EXHIBIT
99.1
VECTOR GROUP LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
OPERATING DATA
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Revenues* |
|
$ |
137,665 |
|
|
$ |
124,965 |
|
|
$ |
368,724 |
|
|
$ |
342,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold* |
|
|
88,329 |
|
|
|
77,880 |
|
|
|
230,974 |
|
|
|
202,780 |
|
Operating, selling, administrative and general expenses |
|
|
23,635 |
|
|
|
27,109 |
|
|
|
69,362 |
|
|
|
76,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
25,701 |
|
|
|
19,976 |
|
|
|
68,388 |
|
|
|
62,986 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Revenues and Cost of goods sold include excise taxes of $48,153,
$42,413, $127,956 and $112,856, respectively. |
-4-